Criteria · College Golf Recruiting
You will visit four programmes in six weeks, hear forty answers, and remember the last one best. This is the workbook that fixes it.
The problem
A flat checklist treats the coach and the class sizes as equally important. They are not. So the decision gets made on whichever visit felt best, and the criteria become the justification rather than the reason.
The other half of the problem is recall. Four campuses, four coaches, dozens of answers, over several weeks. By the time you compare, you are comparing impressions, and impressions favour whoever you saw most recently.
This fixes both. Score in the moment, weight what actually matters, and let the totals be something you can argue with rather than something you feel.
What you get
14 pages, US Letter, built to be printed and written on during a visit.
Seven tabs. Type school names once, they flow everywhere.
Inside the spreadsheet
The weights are a starting point, not a verdict. Disagree with them and type over them. Every section total and every ranking recalculates the moment you do.
Yellow cells are yours. Everything else works itself out.
| Criterion | Weight | Cedar Ridge | Lakeside |
|---|---|---|---|
| The coach | 4 | 16.00 | 8.00 |
| The money | 5 | 25.00 | 15.00 |
| The golf | 3 | 9.00 | 15.00 |
| The program | 4 | 16.00 | 16.00 |
| The school | 3 | 6.00 | 15.00 |
| Weighted total | 19 | 72.00 | 69.00 |
| Rank | 1 | 2 |
The weights
These are the starting weights, with the reasoning. Both files are built for you to overwrite them.
| Criterion | Weight | Why |
|---|---|---|
| The money | The only one that can remove a school entirely | |
| The coach | Decides the daily experience, and can leave | |
| The program | Decides whether they actually compete | |
| The golf | Access matters more than quality | |
| The school | Until the sport stops. Then it is a five. |
How it works
Or open the spreadsheet. Either works alone.
1 to 5, in the moment, before you talk yourself round.
Your judgement, not an average. One alarming answer should not get averaged away by eleven fine ones.
The spreadsheet does this for you.
A gap of two or three points is noise. A gap of ten is telling you something.
Go back and find the criterion you underweighted. It is usually the boring one.
Straight answers
Two files. A 14-page printable PDF worksheet with all 60 questions, red flags, verification steps and a scoring box for each criterion. And an Excel workbook with seven tabs that scores up to five schools and calculates the weighted totals automatically.
The question set is written for college golf recruiting specifically, including course access, qualifying format and winter practice. The method and the scoring structure work for any sport, but roughly a third of the questions are golf-specific.
Yes. The criteria and the weighting are the same across divisions. The money answers differ, so the money section covers the 2025 Division I roster limits, Division II equivalency, and Division III where there is no athletic aid at all.
The workbook opens in Excel, Google Sheets and Numbers. All formulas are standard. If you would rather work on paper, the PDF stands alone and includes its own scorecard page.
Yes, and you should. The weights are pre-filled with a starting point and both files are built for you to overwrite them. In the spreadsheet, changing a weight recalculates every total instantly.
Five in the spreadsheet. The PDF has three columns on its scorecard page, and you can print extra copies for more.
No. It is a decision framework: the questions to ask, what to verify independently, and a way to score what you hear. It does not tell you which school to choose and it is not financial or legal advice.
One decision, four years
60 questions. Five weighted criteria. Five schools. Two files, instantly.
Get the workbook — $19